Death Penalty Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 1

devastation Penalty - Essay ExampleDeath penalisation has been a controversial issue in the transnational community. Many nations have been disturbed and argued ab out the best way it can be handled. This has made contemporaries of questions on how best the capital offenders can be punished in order to have referee for both the offenders and victims of the circumstances. The bill of rights reinforcers the right of individuals to live and associate freely. On the other hand, the same licit supplying is also used to condemn capital offenders to conclusion sentence. The religious community questions the legality of the death sentences and at the same time urges citizens to follow the law. It is still ironical when they defend the law breakers. Many countries stress that the jurist system must be observed for the victims. Several views have been given on this issue. They are legal, religious, semipolitical and socialist perspectives. There are arguments about the pros and cons of work. Publicized studies have also confirm that many spare people have been wrongly executed. On the other hand, the issue of terrorism is a threat to state, specially when the perpetrators are non brought to book. What should be the best action to take? This has brought divergent views.Generally, opinion is divided on the step to take on this issue. Some people insinuate that it will be very valuable on the tax payers side if execution is allowed. It costs about between 2 to five times more to execute a criminal than to maintain a criminal in the prison for the rest of the life (Paternoster and Bacon 91). Those against argue that the financial amount required is pegged on the long move procedures, legal wrangling and many endless appeals. A criminal can be on death row for up to 20 years (Baumgartner, Boydstun and De Boef 47). This is very expensive for the state due to the said legal procedures. Supporters of the death penalty state that it is better to use state resour ces to penalize the mutilateers in order to palliate lives of innocent people. They categorically state that this action creates crime dissuaderent. Crime would always be on the annex if there is no any stern action taken against these people (Vaughn 98). According to research carried out in Pennsylvania alone, there are ineffective defense attorneys who fail to conduct satisfactory investigations to support their clients. This has lead to conviction of innocent suspects, especially those involved in complicated cases (Hood and Hoyle 105). Many cases are confirmed that some lawyers made mistakes and the judges have made rulings based on their findings. It is also argued that death penalty is barbaric form of punishment. Paternoster and Bacon state that all forms of death penalty are unfair (55). In exemplifying this, the argument states, whether it is through lethal injection, hanging, using the firing squad or electric chair, this state approved murder is not fair before a cr owd of people (Paternoster and Bacon 56). For instances, California physicians refused the demand by the government to use lethal injection as a means of execution hence execution was stopped. They claimed that there are many constructive ways in addressing violent crimes and those two wrongs do not make a right (Baumgartner, Boydstun and De Boef 78). However, the proponents of death penalty action feel that this is the only way to deter criminals from any further illegal actions. They argue that justice must be served in favour of the victims. almost fundamental legal provision is that punishment should always fit the crime. In addition, justice delayed is justice denied (Morris 70). Those against death penalty sentences say that it is bad because the state should not use killing to show that murder and manslaughter are bad. There should be another appropriate method. Prison alone is effective because life there is quite deterring, as stated by those who are against the death pena lty. They quote,