Philosophy - animal rights by Peter Singer Essay

Philosophy - animal rights by Peter vocalizer - Essay ExampleIn order to prove the hollowness of this speciesism, Singer provides the example of the history of slavery. The White slave owners never took the sufferings of the ominous slaves into consideration because their moral concerns were limited to White people (135). Thus, according to him, if racism is not moral, speciesism too is immoral. Secondly, Singer opines that animals have interests because they have feelings like pain (135). Also, Singer points out animals have equal rights despite their neglect of communication skills and intelligence because lunatics and infants too enjoy equal rights. The scholar says that equality in quality is not a necessary factor for giving moral value to non homosexual things. He claims that even in spite of appearance the human species, there is wide disparity in qualities like intelligence, physical strength, ability to communicate, and so on.However, the worry with Singers opinion is that in his effort to protect animal rights, he forgot the fact that reality too are animals with the right to protect their own interests like whole other animals do. It is for Singer to translate a cow or a goat that tries to preserve some grass for another species originally filling its own stomach. The mistake with Singers opinion is that he failed to acknowledge the fact that all advanced species take maximum advantage of the circumstances to promote their own welfare. Singer admits the fact that there are pests in nature. Then he has to admit that humans are just another crowd of pests that takes advantage of the suitable circumstances to grow. This is the law of nature.Another vulnerability of his opinion is that he has mixed holiness with nature. The mere fact is that morality is just a social construct which is purely aimed at human welfare. Moreover, the concept of morality, as he admits, is not concrete. It varies from time to time, and population to population. Acc ording to the